Lucy Gilmour, Career and Job Search Coach · Published
Summarise with AI: ChatGPT · Perplexity · Claude · Gemini · Grok
To stop sounding desperate in an interview, stop treating it as a request for a job and start treating it as a business meeting about a problem the employer needs solving. Ask about their challenges, give your honest opinion, and evaluate them as carefully as they evaluate you. You don't need to be employed to do this. You just need to remember that you're the one bringing something valuable to the table.
Prefer to watch? The full video is above (15 min).
Have you ever noticed that when you're happily employed, recruiters can't seem to leave you alone?
They message you on LinkedIn. They tell you about fantastic opportunities. They try to convince you to have a quick conversation.
Then the minute you actually need a job, nothing.
Same experience. Same qualifications. Completely different response.
I spent years as a recruiter and hiring manager, hiring across more than 50 countries, and some of the most interesting conversations I had were with people who weren't looking for a job at all. They were doing well. They were happy where they were. They'd only agreed to speak to me because I'd approached them.
Think about that for a second. I was the recruiter. I had the job to fill. And I was the one trying to convince them.
They asked about the company, the salary, the team, why the role was open and what the business was hoping to achieve. If it didn't sound interesting, they simply said no.
Candidates who had been out of work for several months often had a very different conversation with me. They were so keen to secure something that they focused entirely on convincing me they were suitable, rather than working out whether the opportunity was suitable for them.
Before anybody says it, I know there are very real biases against unemployed candidates. I'm not defending them, and being out of work doesn't make anyone less capable. But there's something else happening here.
One candidate feels they have a choice. The other feels they need somebody to give them one.
That difference changes the entire conversation.
Certain Rolex models are so sought after that you can't just walk into a shop and buy one, and some have traded for well above their retail price. There are lots of reasons for that, but one of them is scarcity. When something is hard to get, people tend to see it as more desirable.
You see a similar dynamic in recruitment. A candidate who isn't actively on the market can seem particularly attractive.
But being less available doesn't make someone more capable. And pretending you're unavailable isn't a strategy I'd recommend.
The real lesson is that perception matters. And what's even more interesting than how an employer perceives you is what needing the job does to your own behaviour.
Imagine you've got an interview tomorrow. You've been out of work for six months, you've had rejection after rejection, and financially things are getting uncomfortable. Then you finally get an interview for a job you really want.
What's going through your head?
"I really need this."
"I can't afford to mess this up."
"What if they ask me something I don't know?"
Suddenly, what should be a conversation between two people discussing a potential working relationship feels like an enormous test. And that's when things go wrong:
Now compare that with somebody who already has a great job. Somebody approached them, they agreed to a conversation, and if it doesn't work out, that's fine. So they ask questions. They challenge things. They're curious. They don't feel the need to prove everything in every answer.
Of course, not everybody who's employed is confident, and not everybody who's unemployed is nervous. But the amount of pressure you put on yourself changes how you come across. It can be the difference between sounding like somebody who really knows what they're doing and somebody who's desperately trying to convince the interviewer that they do.
Picture two candidates. Both have ten years of relevant experience. Both have the qualifications. Both could do the job.
Candidate one says:
"Well, I've been following your company for a while, and I think it's an absolutely amazing business. I'd really love the opportunity to work here. I'm very flexible, I'm happy to take on whatever you need, and I'd be delighted to join the team."
There's nothing wrong with enthusiasm. But did that tell the interviewer anything useful? Not really. It's almost as though they're saying, "Please, pick me."
Candidate two says:
"From what I've seen, you're going through a really interesting period of growth. I've helped businesses navigate similar challenges, particularly around scaling teams and improving operations, so that's what initially caught my attention. But I'd be interested to understand a little more about what you're trying to achieve over the next 12 months and where you see the biggest challenges."
Both candidates want the job. But one is trying to impress, and the other is having a business conversation. One wants approval. The other is exploring whether they can genuinely add value.
You don't need to be employed to sound like candidate two. You don't need another offer or a big bank balance.
One of my clients, Alex, was a chief medical officer in pharma and biotech. He'd been laid off by the board after funding cuts, which is very common in that industry. His personal expenses were high, so he wanted a quick turnaround.
He was getting invited in by several startups and biotechs who wanted his expertise. But in every meeting, he was overly thankful for the opportunity.
That was giving off the wrong impression. These companies looked up to him as an authority figure. When he acted so grateful, it lowered his status in their eyes. If anything, they should have been thankful that someone with his experience would consider them.
I didn't give him new answers or a script. I asked him three questions:
That was the shift. He realised he was the one helping them, not the other way around. He stopped thanking them for inviting him in and started treating each conversation as a business meeting.
Within a matter of weeks, he had three offers on the table.
Ask yourself the same three questions before your next interview. The answers are usually the same as his.
If you're getting interviews but they're not turning into offers, the problem may be how you're positioning yourself, not your experience. Explore the Career Growth Accelerator →
Telling somebody to "just be more confident" isn't particularly helpful. Here's what to do instead.
Most candidates walk in thinking, "I need to get this job." Because that's the objective, everything becomes about pleasing the interviewer.
Walk in thinking this instead:
"I want to find out whether this opportunity is right for me, and whether I'm the right person to help this business."
You're still trying to get hired. But you're also making a decision, and that changes the questions you ask:
Now you're not just being interviewed. You're having a conversation about the business, and you're collecting exactly what you need to show why your experience is relevant.
This one matters most for experienced professionals. Sometimes the hiring manager will say something you don't entirely agree with, and if you're desperate for the job, your instinct is to agree anyway.
That isn't doing you any favours.
Confidence isn't agreeing with everything. It's being comfortable sharing your own expertise, and challenging things respectfully when you need to.
None of this is easy when you've been looking for months. Your confidence may have taken a knock, and after enough rejections it's easy to start questioning whether you're as good as you thought you were.
So before your next interview, spend five minutes remembering a time you were genuinely at your best professionally. A difficult problem you solved, a team you helped, a major project you delivered. Write down:
Then remind yourself: "I've done difficult things before. I'm here to find out whether I can help this business do something similar."
That's not pretending. That's reminding yourself of your actual experience.
There's research behind this. In a 2013 study called Power Gets the Job, people who were asked to recall a time they felt powerful before a selection exercise were rated more favourably, even though the people assessing them didn't know about the exercise. Part of the difference came down to how persuasive they appeared. These were controlled experiments, not proof that five minutes of reflection guarantees an offer. But how you feel about yourself does influence how you present yourself.
If you're nervous, try reframing it rather than fighting it. Psychologist Alison Wood Brooks found that reframing anxiety as excitement improved performance in several experiments, including public speaking. Instead of telling yourself to calm down, try: "I'm excited to find out more about this opportunity."
None of this removes all the nerves, and it doesn't mean you should stop caring about the outcome. It means learning to want the job without letting desperation take over the conversation.
This is the question that trips up most people who've been laid off or have been out of work for a while. Here's the approach I teach.
First, keep the reason for leaving about growth.
Then, instead of rushing to explain what you've been doing since, turn the conversation back to the interviewer with a question. Find out what they're trying to achieve.
Once they've told you, you can connect the two:
"I left because I was looking for more growth. Can I ask, what are you hoping the person in this role will achieve over the next year?"
Then, once they've answered:
"Perfect, that's exactly the sort of growth I was looking for. In fact, while I've been between roles I've been working on [X, Y and Z], which ties directly into what you've just described."
Notice the order. The reason for leaving is growth. What you've been doing since gets answered at the end, after you know what they need, so it lands as relevant experience rather than an excuse for a gap.
It's a more advanced tactic, but done well it completely flips the interview dynamic. They end up chasing you, rather than you chasing them.
This is a tough one. My advice is to detach yourself from the outcome and understand how any negotiation works.
If one side believes the other has no options, they will take advantage of it.
So handle the salary conversation exactly as you would if you didn't need the job:
Yes, even if you need the money. This is often the most effective way to do it.
The most common advice people get when they need a job is to take anything to get themselves back on track. I disagree with it.
What happens is that people lower their aspirations and their expectations, take a role that's beneath them, and then find it much harder to bounce back to where they were, let alone where they want to go. They end up digging their own hole by settling for less than they're worth.
The better route is to stop making one opportunity your entire job search.
If you've got one interview lined up and nothing else happening, it's very easy to treat that job as your only chance. But if you're having conversations with several hiring managers, building relationships with companies you'd like to work for, and getting noticed by decision makers before vacancies are advertised, there's far less riding on any single interview. That's why I encourage people to build a pipeline of opportunities rather than fire out applications and wait.
That doesn't mean firing out applications when you're happy where you are. It means always investing in your career: building relationships, developing your skills, making yourself visible to the right people and exploring opportunities before you need them.
I can't tell you how many people come to me after six, nine, sometimes twelve months out of work. Their savings are running low, the financial pressure is enormous, and the time, money and flexibility they once had to invest in their career just isn't there anymore.
Redundancies can happen completely out of the blue, and not everybody has spare money for career development. But don't wait until your career is in crisis to take it seriously.
When you already have a good job, you have something incredibly valuable: options. You can be selective, negotiate from a stronger position and hold out for a better opportunity, potentially a much bigger salary increase, rather than feeling pressured to accept the first thing that comes along.
Often, yes, but not because employed people are more capable. Employers can see a passive candidate as more desirable, and people who don't need the job tend to interview with more curiosity and less pressure. You can bring that same mindset to an interview whether you're employed or not.
Show interest through questions, not gratitude. Ask why the role is open, what the team's biggest challenge is and what success looks like in six months. Share your honest opinion, and treat the interview as a business conversation about whether you can solve their problem.
Usually not. Taking a role beneath your level lowers your expectations and makes it harder to get back to where you were, or where you want to go. Build a pipeline of conversations with hiring managers instead, so no single offer feels like your only option.
No. The employer has a budget and should know it, so ask what they're looking to pay first. Research the range beforehand, then pitch yourself at the top end or above it, exactly as you would if you didn't need the job.
The goal isn't to pretend you don't care, or to act as though the employer is lucky to have five minutes of your time. It's to recognise that an interview is a two-way conversation.
You can't always control whether an employer chooses you. But you can control how you prepare, the questions you ask and how you communicate the value you bring.
You don't have to be employed to interview like someone who knows what they've got to offer. You just have to stop letting one employer's decision decide how much you value yourself.
Watch the full walkthrough on YouTube
If you've been interviewing without results, the problem may be strategy, not experience. Explore the Career Growth Accelerator →
Lucy Gilmour
Lucy Gilmour is a career coach and job search strategist, helping professionals secure high-impact roles without relying on traditional applications. As a former recruiter who has interviewed thousands of candidates, she specialises in positioning, personal branding, and interview strategy to help clients stand out and get hired faster.